|
Analysis:
Peso a turnkey in OFW money flow
by
ISAGANI DE LA PAZ
IT’S
a catch-22 of sorts for the Philippines as remittances from
Filipinos abroad continue to strengthen the peso, threatening
to dampen its flow.
The latter occurring, while expected by some financial executives,
won’t help an economy already hurting from a drop in
exports that continues to reel from a strong peso.
The peso flexed its muscles again on the first day of trading
of a new year, reflecting a sustained strengthening against
a weakening greenback.
The Philippine Dealing System showed on January 4 the peso
closing at P45.95 to a US dollar from P46.2 in the last trading
day of 2009.
Among many reasons offered for the uncanny strength of the
peso, the steady flow of remittances is one.
Citing Bangko Sentral ng Pilipinas data, former Finance Secretary
Roberto F. De Ocampo noted the “resilience” of
remittances, hitting US$12.8 billion for the first nine months
of last year and representing a growth rate of 4.2 percent
cumulative year-on-year.
He added that the surge in remittances may be due to the spike
in the need of families of overseas Filipinos after two typhoons
hit the country hard during the last quarter.
“As households affected by typhoon Ondoy and Pepeng
constitute a large share of remittances flowing into the country,
a strong increase in remittance inflows for the fourth quarter
is expected.”
De Ocampo said in a forum mid-December that remittances “act
as an insurance to households affected by natural disasters”.
Sans citing sources, De Ocampo added that an average of 60
percent of household income lost through natural disasters
is replaced by remittances.
“Revival of private spending should continue with the
steady rise in remittances from overseas family members, and
may even strengthen as those affected by the typhoons tap
savings or borrow to fix and refurbish their homes.”
And with the holiday spending, the volume of cash sent by
Filipinos abroad is expected to increase, economist Alvin
Ang of the University of Santo Tomas told the OFW Journalism
Consortium.
But while the Philippine government expects US$19-billion
worth of remittances for the whole year of 2009, according
to De Ocampo, Ang pegged remittances to hit only $17 billion.
Ang’s forecast is based on an annualized computation
of remittances divided by month.
He also forecast in 2008 that a slowdown in remittance flow
is in the offing, mainly due to the weakening US economy.
Face-off
PHILIPPINE Exporters Confederation Inc. (Philexport) president
Sergio Luiz Ortiz Jr. said in a briefing the Monday before
Christmas that a strong peso may break the remittance flow
rally.
Exports form nearly 37 percent of the country’s gross
domestic product; remittances at 10 percent, according to
government statistics.
Ortiz said he expects overseas Filipino workers, or those
working abroad on a temporary basis, to reject the peso going
down to the P45-exchange rate level.
De Ocampo forecast a band of P45 to P47 versus the greenback
this year.
Financial institutions like the World Bank has forecast a
P47.3-to-a-dollar while there is a consensus that the peso
will stay at the P46.6 level for the whole of 2010.
“OFWs would be the noisiest group if the peso continues
its climb,” Ortiz said.
He noted that with an election year, politicians should very
well address the strong-peso regime.
“It won’t be politically and economically-feasible
to let it [peso] go down below P45.”
A strong peso, notably, is also anathema to exporters who,
according to Ortiz, have seen a dramatic slash in revenue
as the country’s major trading partner, the United States,
went into recession in 2008.
But according to De Ocampo, the peso is the least of the reasons
for the weak exports.
The former president of the Asian Institute of Management
said the “projected slow increase in RP exports reflects
the projected slow expansion in world trade volume”
this year. It also mirrors the limited prospects for international
market share gains.
These two elements also impact on remittance flow as, again
according to De Ocampo, overseas demand for Filipino labor
in traditional sectors like healthcare and other basic services
is not projected to remain strong.
This “could result in lower demand in some sectors,”
he noted citing seafarers in particular would be affected
by the slow growth in world trade volume.
Trouble
SUCH scenario spells trouble for the economy as, according
to de Ocampo, he sees “lower economic growth due to
lower growth in personal consumption expenditure largely due
to a slowdown in overseas remittances.”
“Though remittances have increased, it has done so in
a much slower pace.”
“Likewise,” Small Business Corp. president Benel
P. Lagua said in a separate forum, “there have been
downward pressures on remittances.”
A strong peso is a source of this pressure.
Still, studies and data have shown that despite this, Filipinos
still send money home.
Dilip Ratha of the World Bank explained that a weak greenback
has “encouraged higher remittances to compensate for
the loss of purchasing power vis-à-vis appreciating
local currencies and rising costs of living in the origin
countries.”
Also, with no let-up in overseas labor deployment, remittance
volume has been increasing, further fueling the peso’s
strength.
Lagua, hence, urged that “since remittances are more
stable source of foreign currency than many other non-trade
sources, Asian governments should ensure that they are able
to maximize the labor flows.”
He added this can be done “by ensuring that the migration
channel is kept open, enhance the safety and security of formal
systems for fund transfers, and provide an environment that
encourages households to invest more of the funds that they
receive.”
“International remittances are very important sources
of foreign exchange and funds for developing countries like
the Philippines and many other Asian economies. The earnings
and remittances of our migrant workers are considered important
mechanisms for reducing poverty.”
But a slowdown amid a strengthening peso may still mean a
long climb to development for the Philippines.
This
article is free, but to publish, broadcast, rewrite, or redistribute
this, please write or email the OFW Journalism Consortium
editor@ofwjournalism.net
or ofwjournalism@gmail.com
for permission.
|