|
Remittances
help foil Asia Crisis repeat, World Bank study says
By ISAGANI DE LA PAZ
MANILA—ACROSS the East Asia
region sweeps the wind of prosperity and cash remittances
as well as knowledge capital by migrant workers
has helped economies become more robust a decade
after a devastating crisis.
Aside from the Philippines, the World Bank cited
remittances from workers overseas also helped other
countries like Vietnam and Mongolia to beef up cash
reserves. Hence, remittances could soften and may
even foil a repeat of the 1997 Asian crisis –if
ever there would be one in the near future.
“A decade after the financial crisis that
devastated East Asia in 1997-98, the region is far
wealthier, has fewer poor people and a larger global
role than ever before. Led by continued strong growth
in China, Emerging East Asia now has an aggregate
output of over $5 trillion, double the dollar value
just before the crisis,” said the WB report
titled “Ten Years after the Crisis”.
The report noted that the economies affected by
the crisis: Indonesia, Malaysia, Philippines, Korea,
and Thailand, posted real per capita incomes “significantly”
exceeding pre-crisis levels.
The WB noted that the first three economies achieved
real per capita income growth of 3-3.5 percent,
“with per-capita growth in Korea and Thailand
averaging 4-4.5 percent” in the four years
ending 2006.
The cause, in particular with the Philippines, is
consumption or the purchase of consumers by what
the country’s factories produce, retailers
sell, and businesses import-for-sale from abroad.
“Consumers in the Philippines also increased
real expenditures by 5-6 percent, supported in part
by a 20-percent rise in remittances from abroad,”
the WB said.
Compared with Thailand's 3.2-percent consumer-demand
growth last year, the Philippines posted a 5.5-percent
growth from just 4.9 percent in 2005. Both countries
are regarded as developing economies compared to
the four newly industrialized economies of Hong
Kong, Korea, Singapore and Taiwan, China.
The bank noted that remittances, coupled with the
strong performance of the Philippines’s electronics
exports, “far outweighed the impact of higher
imported oil prices on the current account”.
The country’s current account –available
cash for loans, payment of debts, for investments,
and others flowing in the system- jumped to a US$5-billion
surplus last year from US$2 billion in 2005.
The percentage increase (to US$12.8 billion in 2006)
in remittances, the WB added, underscores the vital
role played by money from Filipinos working abroad.
“Through these flows [remittances and transfers
for the balance of payments], which together account
for over 13 percent of GDP [gross domestic product],
large trade deficits have been transformed into
current account surpluses, which in 2006 grew to
over four percent of GDP,” the bank said.
A trade deficit would mean the Philippines buys
more products from other countries than what it
sells or exports.
Remittances may be one of the reasons why the Philippines,
along with Korea and Malaysia, quickly “regained
their pre-crisis level of per-capita income by 1999,
while this took longer, till 2003, in Indonesia
and Thailand,” according to the WB report.
Economist Fernando Aldaba told the OFW Journalism
Consortium “the numbers, especially an uptick
in exports, support sentiments” that remittances
could help avert a crisis that this time, analysts
like him say, could come from a slowdown in the
United States economy.
“I would agree that factors for another Asian
crisis are not present or, if there are, the countries
in the region have wizened up,” Aldaba, who
teaches economics at the Ateneo de Manila University,
said in a phone interview.
However, Aldaba said that he wouldn’t single
out remittances from Filipinos working temporarily
or permanently abroad as a single instrument that
could help avert another crisis.
“The 1997 crisis was marked with capital flight,
and even at that time the shock to the Philippines
was relatively less compared to Thailand since our
money was no longer pegged to the dollar,”
he explained.
Still, awash with cash from remittances, the Philippines
could have the elbow room to maneuver, Aldaba said.
“Remittances could mitigate the impact of
a crisis that would engulf the region if the economic
slowdown in the US hit,” he added.
Likewise, Aldaba said, the right fiscal and monetary
policies would still be the main weapons that the
country could wield considering that the economy
and the market is relatively small.
With the right mix of reining in inflation and control
of money supply, he explained, the Philippine economy
may weather shocks from a US economic slowdown even
with a decline in remittances.
He added that he doesn’t see the latter from
occurring since he believes the flow of money from
Filipinos overseas hasn’t reached its peak
despite the strengthening of the peso against the
greenback.
“The outflow of workers hasn’t declined
so unless that occurs, we may see a plateau in remittances
before it decreases. But the decline wouldn’t
happen in the next five years,” Aldaba said.
Even the WB notes such view, but with caution since
the record-high 1.026 million Filipino workers who
left for employment overseas last year, “in
part reflects the lack of domestic employment opportunities.”
That, and a host of other challenges posed by the
WB, remains as the Philippines joins its East Asian
neighbors in marking this year as a time of prosperity
a decade after a debilitating crisis. end
This
article is free, but to publish, broadcast, rewrite,
or redistribute this, please write or email the
OFW Journalism Consortium editor@ofwjournalism.net
or ofwjournalism@gmail.com
for permission.
|